Is it necessary for the Nomination and Acknowledgement of Enhanced Trusted Agent (ETA) Responsibilities form to include the name and signature of an alternate ETA?

Including the name and signature of an alternate Enhanced Trusted Agent (ETA) on the Nomination and Acknowledgement of ETA Responsibilities form is crucial for several reasons.

First, having an alternate ETA ensures that there is a designated backup individual who is trained and empowered to perform the responsibilities of the primary ETA when necessary. This is important for maintaining continuity and ensuring that the functions of the PKI are consistently upheld, particularly during situations such as absences, deployments, or transitions.

Second, the acknowledgment of the alternate’s role and responsibilities reinforces the accountability structure within the PKI framework. By formally recognizing the alternate ETA, it establishes clear lines of authority and support, which helps mitigate risks associated with information security and access control.

Lastly, ensuring that both the primary and alternate ETAs are recognized in this way helps in validating the process and maintaining the integrity of the PKI system as a whole. This is vital for adhering to Army regulations and guidelines concerning roles and responsibilities related to trusted agents.